Given that the goal of EmployerReport.com is to inform on the issues affecting the American work place, every now and then we must comment on the oddities and idiocies of the day (for example see last Monday's post). Here, dear readers, is yet another example of the absurd:Monday, March 12, 2007
Persian pu**ies?...Iranians upset at US over movie 300
Given that the goal of EmployerReport.com is to inform on the issues affecting the American work place, every now and then we must comment on the oddities and idiocies of the day (for example see last Monday's post). Here, dear readers, is yet another example of the absurd:Friday, March 9, 2007
NYT on the Employee Free Choice Act: All the Pro-Union Lies Fit to Print
Their most recent one entitled NEW YORK TIMES ON THE EMPLOYEE FREE CHOICE ACT: ALL THE PRO-UNION LIES FIT TO PRINT? is an excellent piece that debunks much of the pro-union bunk (read bulls**t) that Congress has bought into, as well as the union 'spin' that the media is echoing from the halls of the AFL-CIO.
Included in the debunking is the oft-quoted Kate Brofenbrenner "study," which nearly all of the unions use in attempting to convince Congress (which they've succeeded thus far) and the public that companies are bad and the unions are being undermined at every step of the organizing way.
As you read their blog, there is another factoid that people seem to be missing in the EFCA debate and that is that unions are currently winning nearly 60% of the NLRB-conducted SECRET-BALLOT elections, according to NLRB stats from the last couple of years.
Enjoy their blog, then pass it along!
Thursday, March 8, 2007
The Two Faces of the UFCW
The United Food & Commercial Workers, a union that like to portray itself as a friend of the working class, has been showing that it is a union of double standards and hypocrisy.Recently, office staff who work at UFCW local 832 went out on strike against their employer—the United Food & Commercial Workers. The workers’ strike against the UFCW lasted for five weeks and ended with a four-year wage freeze. Then, according to the Winnipeg Sun:
[UFCW]Management gloated on its website following the strike, boasting that they got employees to "accept less" in the new deal. Talk about adding salt to the wound.
The organization even suggested it would start cutting staff and has already fired one worker who was on the picket line -- a move workers say is pure intimidation.
"One good thing that did come from this strike is that we know how to make this
(organization) run more efficiently and we've realized we don't need the amount of staff that we have," the president of the [UFCW] said on the website.
We are sure that the membership, as well as us, never thought that a “labor organization” would treat its own members (or staff employees) like this. Apparently, the quote “an injustice to one, is an injustice to all” doesn’t apply to “all” of us.
We can’t help but wonder what the Union leadership’s reaction would be if the company had done this same thing to five members working in the stores or warehouses.
UFCW bosses forcing their own employees on strike.
UFCW bosses bragging about getting their own workers to accept less.
UFCW bosses firing their own employees for no apparent reason…
ARE THESE THE TYPE OF PEOPLE YOU’D WANT TO REPRESENT YOU AND TAKE YOUR MONEY?
Wednesday, March 7, 2007
SEIU & the legalization of illegal aliens...

To us, the SEIU's endorsement of legalizing illegals is nothing more than political pandering to a segment of the population that the union has high hopes of turning into dues-paying members--and we expect to see other unions issue similar endorsements in the near future.
Establishing a fairer, more inclusive citizenship test, funding community-based citizenship initiatives, and increasing accountability for background checks will make our Union safer and stronger for all Americans.
Monday, March 5, 2007
Our National Distractions: A freak show, a circus, and Marx


When Marx said in 1843 that 'religion is the opiate of the masses,' that may have been apropos in the age of Victorian mores. However, it is clear that Marx didn't live long enough to see the circus of our age...Our national politicos and their media minions.Thursday, March 1, 2007
An Open Letter to American Workers on the so-called "Employee Free Choice Act"
Dear fellow American worker:
On Thursday, March 1, 2007, the United States House of Representatives voted 241-185 to strip you of some of your basic American freedoms. While many of us are used to politicians doing things that take away our freedoms, this action may very soon cost you a lot money and, for an untold number of you, it will likely cost you your jobs.
On Thursday, due to the political strong-arming from big union bosses, the House of Representatives voted to pass HR 800. HR 800 is a bill designed to take away your right as a worker to vote in a secret-ballot election about whether or not you want to become unionized. Once you are unionized, HR 800 also forces your company into a union contract imposed by government-appointed bureaucrats who have no idea about the competitive nature of your company’s business.
Most of us remember what has happened to big industries and the jobs that were dominated by big union bosses—and we know where they are today…Most are gone.
While HR 800 still needs to be passed through the Senate and signed into law by the president before it becomes effective, here’s how the House of Representatives has just stripped you of your basic democratic rights:
In order to replenish their depleted union ranks, union organizers—the paid salespeople of labor unions—can target you and your co-workers for unionization. Once you become targeted, there are a variety of tactics they can deploy to lure you into placing your name and signature on a little 3” by 5” card called a union authorization card. For example:
Some union organizers will claim that the little card is just to get you information or to be on a mailing list.
Others will claim the union’s authorization card will get you more money or better benefits or job security.
Some union organizers will mount larger offensives called tag teams to wear you or your co-workers down into signing a union authorization card.
The reality is, a union authorization card is the union’s golden ticket to get into your pocket and into the company you work for.
You see, if 50% plus one of your co-workers succumb to union pressure (or fall for their tactics) and sign a union authorization card, you no longer have the right to vote in a secret-ballot election… You will have just become unionized, under HR 800.
At that point, there will be a set of negotiations that will be government-imposed between your company and the union. If there is no agreement reached after 120 days (four months), a government-appointed arbitrator will bind you and your company into a contract with the union.
Again, you will not have the right to vote to accept or reject this government-imposed contract.
For those of you who work in the 28 states where it is legal to require workers to pay dues to the union to remain employed, you may also be forced to pay the union hundreds (or thousands) of dollars per year or you will be fired from your job.
In addition, if the government-imposed contract jeopardizes your company’s ability to compete in the marketplace, your company may be forced to lay you off, to outsource your job, or just close like so many other unionized companies have in the last 25 years.
As a courtesy, you may click here to view the list of US Representatives who have done this to you and your job. While there is little you can do about Thursday’s vote in the US House of Representatives now, you can still write to your Senator to voice your opposition to taking away your American freedoms and possibly your job.
For more information, and to voice your opposition to stripping you of your rights to the US Senate, please visit EmployerReport.com or myprivateballot.com.
Very truly yours,
EmployerReport.com
[To download a PDF version of this letter to distribute to your co-workers, click here. Note: This should be printed on legal sized paper.]
